Tucker Vorster vs Chevaan Davids Head to Head Stats
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W L L W L L W W L
Form
L L L L W L L L L LH2H: Vorster 2 - 0 Davids
They have played 4 sets in total, with Vorster winning 4 and Davids winning 0. The last match between Vorster and Davids was at the Gabon F2, 31-08-2015, Second, Hard with Tucker Vorster getting the victory 6-1 6-0.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Tucker Vorster | 2 |
| Chevaan Davids | 0 |
Gabon F2(31-08-2015)
6
1
6
0
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Bergs VS Nishioka PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
23 Apr 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Maneiro VS Sherif PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
22 Apr 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-1 6-0 | |||||
| 7-5 6-1 | |||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 4 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 25 | Games Won | 7 |
| 0 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 0 | Total Double Faults | 0 |
| 0:0:0 | Average Match Time | 0:0:0 |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 2nd Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Return Points Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (2/2) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/2) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (2/2) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (2/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (2/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Tucker Vorster Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats 
Nikala Scholtz
Player
Tucker Vorster
63%
(
40 of
64)
1st Serve %
74%
(
53 of
72)
15
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
2
83%
(
33 of
40)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
40 of
53)
67%
(
16 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
15 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
24 of
72)
73
Total Points Won
63
|
6-4 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tucker Vorster
Player
Jaime Pulgar-Garcia
66%
(
57 of
87)
1st Serve %
53%
(
44 of
83)
7
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
9
70%
(
40 of
57)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
28 of
44)
53%
(
16 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
22 of
39)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
36%
(
31 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
33 of
83)
89
Total Points Won
81
|
6-4 2-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tucker Vorster
Player
Milen Ianakiev
78%
(
43 of
55)
1st Serve %
72%
(
50 of
69)
3
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
3
77%
(
33 of
43)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
37 of
50)
67%
(
8 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
5 of
19)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
25%
(
14 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
27 of
69)
68
Total Points Won
56
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Peter Kobelt
Player
Tucker Vorster
72%
(
46 of
64)
1st Serve %
61%
(
38 of
62)
16
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
3
83%
(
38 of
46)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
28 of
38)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
25%
(
16 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
20 of
62)
68
Total Points Won
58
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Daniel Cox
Player
Tucker Vorster
45%
(
24 of
53)
1st Serve %
60%
(
28 of
47)
11
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
1
83%
(
20 of
24)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
5 of
19)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
34%
(
18 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
28 of
47)
63
Total Points Won
37
|
6-0 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Tucker Vorster
Player
Gui Gomes
67%
(
26 of
39)
1st Serve %
60%
(
30 of
50)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
73%
(
19 of
26)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
69%
(
9 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
28%
(
11 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
28 of
50)
56
Total Points Won
33
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Tim Van Rijthoven
Player
Tucker Vorster
58%
(
42 of
72)
1st Serve %
64%
(
43 of
67)
11
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
2
88%
(
37 of
42)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
29 of
43)
47%
(
14 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
67%
(
16 of
24)
25%
(
1 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
29%
(
21 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
22 of
67)
73
Total Points Won
66
|
6-4 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Petros Chrysochos
Player
Tucker Vorster
43%
(
35 of
81)
1st Serve %
60%
(
44 of
73)
6
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
6
80%
(
28 of
35)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
31 of
44)
57%
(
26 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
33%
(
27 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
27 of
73)
81
Total Points Won
73
|
6-2 1-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Tucker Vorster
Player
Alan Gadjiev
56%
(
59 of
106)
1st Serve %
55%
(
47 of
85)
3
Aces
5
6
Double Faults
10
64%
(
38 of
59)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
36 of
47)
60%
(
28 of
47)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
14 of
38)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
38%
(
40 of
106)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
35 of
85)
101
Total Points Won
90
|
6-4 6-7(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Peter Polansky
Player
Tucker Vorster
61%
(
33 of
54)
1st Serve %
71%
(
46 of
65)
7
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
2
94%
(
31 of
33)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
37 of
46)
90%
(
19 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
7%
(
4 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
29%
(
19 of
65)
69
Total Points Won
50
|
6-4 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
view more
Chevaan Davids Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | 6-1 6-0 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-3 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 7-6(2) 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Lloyd Segal
Player
Chevaan Davids
70%
(
62 of
88)
1st Serve %
58%
(
49 of
84)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
5
60%
(
37 of
62)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
32 of
49)
46%
(
12 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
15 of
35)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
44%
(
39 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
37 of
84)
86
Total Points Won
86
|
2-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Dekel Bar
Player
Chevaan Davids
59%
(
20 of
34)
1st Serve %
49%
(
19 of
39)
5
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
90%
(
18 of
20)
1st Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
71%
(
10 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
6 of
34)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
23 of
39)
51
Total Points Won
22
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 | 6-2 6-4 | H2H | |||
| R2 | 6-1 6-0 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-4 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-3 6-3 | H2H | |||
| QF | 4-6 7-5 6-0 | H2H | |||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 65% (169/91) | Win/Loss | 37% (11/19) |
| 63% (363/216) | Sets Win/Loss | 39% (26/41) |
| 55% (3003/2449) | Games Win/Loss | 45% (255/316) |
| 68% (153/72) | Hard Win/Loss | 37% (11/19) |
| 44% (4/5) | Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 48% (12/13) | Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.16 | Aces Per Game | 0 |
| 425 | Aces Total | 0 |
| 0.06 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.03 |
| 156 | Total Double Faults | 9 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 543.87 | Average Opponent Rank | 281.13 |
| 65% (3145/4868) | 1st Serve % | 55% (68/123) |
| 72% (2279/3145) | 1st Serve Win % | 57% (39/68) |
| 52% (895/1723) | 2nd Serve Win % | 44% (24/55) |
| 40% (149/371) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 56% (5/9) |
| 35% (1616/4615) | Return Points Win % | 37% (45/122) |
| 0% (0/0) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 71% (5/2) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 42% (18/25) | Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 70% (146/64) | Futures W/L | 37% (11/19) |
| 66% (162/247) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 37% (11/30) |
| 50% (3/6) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 59% (58/98) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 67% (2/3) |
| 57% (33/58) | Deciding Set Win % | 43% (3/7) |
| 93% (158/147) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 77% (13/10) |
| 7% (158/11) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 23% (13/3) |
| 22% (102/22) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 6% (17/1) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
